Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.Ĭheers.- InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:Maroon 5 - One More Night.ogg įile:Maroon 5 - One More Night.ogg is being used on this article.If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.This message is updated dynamically through the template (last update: 18 January 2022). Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals.
#MAROON 5 OVEREXPOSED ALBUM DOWNLOAD ZIPPYSHARE ARCHIVE#
No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. This message was posted before February 2018. When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I have just modified 7 external links on Overexposed (album). No further edits should be made to this section. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. It should be a dab page and not a redirect, as the above said. At the very least, overexposed should be dab, not a redirect. Matthiaspaul ( talk) 23:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC) A rather clear case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, IMO. Strong oppose WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as previously mentioned.Oppose – an obscure title should not generally be primary over a generic term.Betty Logan ( talk) 21:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC) The term has been in standard use for many years and will continue to be applied within the field of photography when the album is long forgotten. Most of the hits for the music album are promotional. The photography term is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here as a Google 'books' and 'scholar' search reveals it has received more significant RS coverage and is of far greater educational value. Strong oppose a photograph is 'overexposed', so would be something someone would look for.Maybe "Overexposure", but not "Overexposed". Overexposed (album) → Overexposed – I may be wrong, but I can't see why people would search "overexposed" when looking for exposure to light. BDD ( talk) 17:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) The result of the proposal was not moved. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
0 kommentar(er)
